It is the go to for information for all situations. It can
settle a bet between friends, provide you with instant information on thousands
and thousands of topics, or give you the perfect factoid that your research paper
was missing. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that is free to the public to
view, edit, and create. There are over a million articles with thousands of administrators
and editors attempting to keep all the information accurate and organized.
Because of its format, there are obvious risks involved when
using Wikipedia as a source. While most of the information on Wikipedia is
correct, there are “WikiTrolls” those who knowingly upload incorrect
information; there are also times when users may unknowingly upload incorrect
information by mistake. Even though wrong information is taken down, there is
always the possibility that for the brief moment you are conducting your
research for your final paper, you happen across this bad information
masquerading as truth. This risk begs the question of if Wikipedia should be
used as a source at all?
In
a post from The Official Blog of the Delaware Division of Libraries, this
exact question was raised and answered. In 2005, a study was conducted to test
Wikipedia’s reliability. Several scientific articles from Wikipedia and the Encyclopedia Britannica were compared. Back
then, Wikipedia held its own with having four factual errors to every three found
in Encyclopedia Britannica; however,
Wikipedia was not nearly as organized or well structured. Seven years later in
2012 a
similar study was conducted. This time Wikipedia articles often scored
better than a standard encyclopedia based on accuracy, references, style, and
quality.
No comments:
Post a Comment